Term Papers Tagged With: The mystery does not reveal itself to the reader until the end of the story, yet it leaves a lot to the imagination.
February 22, by Stan Trybulski 2 Comments The tragic shooting under murky circumstances of Reeva Steenkamp, the beautiful girlfriend of Olympic runner Oscar Pistorius, brings to mind another famous shooting that also bore claims of both accident and murder: When one thinks of Ernest Hemingway, one rarely, if ever, thinks of him as a mystery writer.
Hem eschewed genre fiction, at least as a writer, although he was a great lover of the hardboiled detective story and enjoyed reading Dashiell Hammett, Raymond Chandler and the Black Mask mystery magazine.
Yet Hem wrote one the best mystery short stories ever written; a story in which the killing takes place at the very end of the plot instead of the beginning.
He spent his mornings locked away in his writing room in the house on Whitehead Street in Key West, getting rid of things by writing. And as in all Hemingway stories, the dramatis personae are few in number. The essential facts of the case are as follows: Francis Macomber, an unhappy member of the idle rich has brought his unfaithful wife of eleven years, Margot, on an African safari in hopes that the trip will repair their marriage.
They have engaged professional hunter Wilson to guide them.
While hunting a lion, a nervous Macomber only wounds the beast and he and Wilson must go into the bush and finish the wounded animal off. Macomber is afraid and when the lion suddenly springs up out of the grass, he panics and runs, saved only by a quick shot by Wilson.
The next morning Macomber is angry with both his wife and Wilson, but all three go off to hunt water buffalo. A change overcomes Macomber, perhaps a reaction from the shame of the previous day, perhaps from the rage he feels within him. His fear dissipates and he shoots three of the buffalo.
One of the buffalo, a large bull, is wounded and highly dangerous but Macomber, no longer afraid, is anxious to finish the job.
Leaving Margot in the car with one of the rifles, a Mannlicher 6. When the wounded bull suddenly springs out of the bush to charge Macomber he stands his ground and aims for the kill but never gets the shot off because 9.
Until now, analysis of the case has centered on the motivation of Mrs. Did she accidently shoot her husband in a sudden, desperate attempt to save his life, as the narrator of the story states?
Philip Young, the chief prosecutor of this theory, once remarked? The morning after her moonlight coupling with Wilson, she and her husband have a row over breakfast and her husband tells her that he knows she will never leave him. She admits this and then tells him to behave himself, which further infuriates Macomber.
Anticipation of what, members of the jury? That her husband would shoot the animal and finish the job? That he would cut and run? Or that the maddened buffalo would kill him, leaving her a wealthy widow? That is for you to decide, ladies and gentleman.
That is what the narrator tells us had occurred, members of the jury.
She saw the change in Francis Macomber now. She tries to regain the psychological upper hand over him when he keeps talking but fails.
She was very afraid of something. As they close in on the wounded animal, Macomber and Wilson go off into the grass to kill it while Margot remains in the car with the Mannlicher, which Wilson had left behind, saying it was unnecessary because the two hunters each had their own rifle.
Macomber, looking back at the car, saw his wife, with the rifle by her side, looking at him. He waved at her but she did not wave back. As he aimed again, Margot fired the Mannlicher.
Thus, we have the theory that Margot deliberately killed her husband because she could no longer control him. He was a new man, he had learned the code of the Hemingway hero and turned his cowardice into bravery and his new found knowledge turned him into a murder victim.
This theory is also backed up by the conscious level of the Hemingway psyche. Accidental shooting or deliberate murder? Young pointed out that as far as he was concerned, the motivation was clear: But just whose motivation?Ernest Hemingway has created a masterpiece of mystery in his story "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber".
The mystery does not reveal itself to the reader until the end of the story, yet it leaves a lot to the imagination. The Intentional Death of Francis Macomber.
|The Intentional Death Of Francis Macomber - Online Term Paper||The mystery does not reveal itself to the reader until the end of the story, yet it leaves a lot to the imagination.|
|What are You Studying?||Synopsis[ edit ] "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber" is a third person omniscient narrative with moments of unreliable interior monologue presented mainly through the points of view of the two leading, male characters, Francis Macomber and Robert Wilson.|
Ernest Hemingway has created a masterpiece of mystery in his story "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber". The mystery does not reveal itself to the reader until the end of the story, yet it leaves a lot to the imagination. 1 The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber by Ernest Hemingway It was now lunch time and they were all sitting under the double green fly of the dining tent pretending that nothing had happened.
"The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber" is a short story by Ernest Hemingway. "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber" is a third person omniscient narrative with moments of unreliable interior monologue presented mainly through the points of view of the two leading, But with Macomber’s transition from boy to man comes death.
The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber The short story “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber” is about a heroic test of physical and emotional courage/5(1). The Intentional Death of Francis Macomber, Free Study Guides and book notes including comprehensive chapter analysis, complete summary analysis, author biography information, character profiles, theme analysis, metaphor analysis, and top ten quotes on classic literature.