Contact Presidential Vetoes George Washington was the first president to veto Congressional legislation, exercising that prerogative once in each of his administrations. In both instances, Congress failed to override his veto. United States [Philadelphia] April 5
Editions Presidential Vetoes George Washington was the first president to veto Congressional legislation, exercising that prerogative once in each of his administrations. In both instances, Congress failed to override his Jefferson apportionment essays.
United States [Philadelphia] April 5 First—The Constitution has prescribed that representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers: Second—The Constitution has also provided that the number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand; which restriction is, by the context, and by fair and obvious construction, to be applied to the seperate and respective numbers of the States: Attorney General Randolph and Secretary of State Jefferson complained separately on 4 April that as the bill established the total number of representatives,by dividing the aggregate of the federal census by 30, it was unconstitutional.
After careful consideration, Washington concluded that Randolph and Jefferson were correct about the unconstitutionality of the bill. Even so, he hesitated to veto it.
United States [Philadelphia], February 28, Gentlemen of the House of Representatives: Having maturely considered the Bill to alter and amend an Act entitled an Act to ascertain and fix the military establishment of the United States which was presented to me on the twenty second day of this Month I now return it to the House of Representatives, in which it originated with my objections.
If the Bill passes into a law the two Companies of light dragoons will be from that moment legally out of service, though they will afterwards continue actually in service, and for their services during this interval, namely from the time of legal to the time of actual discharge, it will be unlawful to pay them, unless some future provision be made by law.
Though they may be discharged at the pleasure of Congress, in justice they ought to receive their pay not only to the time of passing the law, but at least to the time of their actual discharge.
It will be inconvenient and injurious to the public to dismiss the light Dragoons as soon as notice of the law can be conveyed to them; one of the Companies having been lately destined to a necessary and important service.
The Companies of Light Dragoons consist of one hundred and twenty six non commissioned Officers and privates, who are bound to serve as dismounted Dragoons, when ordered so to do; they have received in bounties about two thousand dollars; one of them is completely equipped, and above half of the non commissioned Officers and privates have yet to serve more than one third the term of their inlistment; and besides there will in the course of the year be a considerable deficiency in the complement of infantry intended to be continued.
It is generally agreed that some Cavalry either Militia or regular will be necessary and according to the best information I have been able to obtain, it is my opinion, that the latter will be less expensive and more useful than the former, in preserving peace between the frontier settlers, and the Indians and therefore a part of the Military establishment should consist of Cavalry.Jefferson's method was used for the apportionment (h=) and continued to be used until , when a method suggested by Daniel Webster was adopted.
Jefferson wrote to Madison advocating a Bill of Rights: "Half a loaf is better than no bread. in No.
46 of The Federalist Papers, a series of essays promoting the Federalist position. Hamilton opposed a bill of rights in The Federalist No. 84, stating that "the constitution is itself in .
The U.S. has used several formulae for apportionment since Almost as soon as the first census was completed in , political thinkers, including Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, began suggesting their own methods. Source: U.S.
Census Bureau | Census History Staff | Last Revised: December 11, Read this essay on Hamilton Apportionment Method. Come browse our large digital warehouse of free sample essays. Get the knowledge you need in order to pass your classes and more. Only at initiativeblog.com".
Apportionment is a great way to achieve fair representation as long as we are not using the Hamilton Method. The Hamilton Method has the possibility of cause three types of paradoxes: the Alabama paradox, the population paradox, and the new states paradox.
Hamilton vs. Jefferson Essay Ashley Wall U.S. History 1/27/11 Ashley Wall U.S. History 1/27/11 Hamilton VS. Jefferson Both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson have different views about the future of America, but they .